Jacqueline Barton

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

• Recent inflation numbers suggesting that inflation remains ‘sticky’.
• Central Bank interest rate increases are back on the table but still less likely than cuts.
• US economic growth softens in the March quarter.

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact the team.

The Big Picture

If March was the month that central banks started to cut rates – or at least foreshadow cuts – April witnessed at least the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), talking of pushing the timing of cuts back – and even introducing the chance of more interest rate increases. Market pricing moved the first Fed interest rate cut from June out to September at the start of the month. Even September is now looking uncertain unless clear new economic data come to hand that is sufficient to support the Fed to cut interest rates. One rate cut in December is becoming the dominant call priced into money markets.

By and large, new inflation data in the US and Australia were lower than in the previous month/quarter. So, what was the problem? The key word is ‘stickiness’.

Late last year there was lots of optimism of inflation rates making serious progress towards central bank inflation rate target zones.

We have done quite a bit of research into the reasons for this stickiness. In the US, we found that by far the main problem is with the ‘shelter’ component which comprises about 33% of the broad Consumer Price Index (CPI). Official US data of CPI excluding shelter makes it clear that the inflation problem has been solved in everything except shelter. This shelter excluded index was in the target zone (of 2% or less) for each month from May 2023 to February 2024. The latest reading of 2.3% can reasonably be accounted for by a slight blip in oil prices as a result of the ongoing Middle East conflict.

The US shelter index is based on actual rents plus ‘owner equivalent rents’ (OER) which provides a proxy for the cost of home ownership. Not only does the US use a rolling 12-month window to calculate the annual window, individual rental ‘prices’ are typically held constant over the term of the lease – say 12-months or more. This method of calculating inflation has the effect of locking in any big change for two years or more.

Rents however seem impervious to fed rate policy. Shelter inflation is largely due to the supply-demand imbalance during a period of strong immigration and dislocations through the reaction to the pandemic. The ‘formula’ for calculating shelter inflation means that it is highly unlikely that the shelter component will reach 2% by the end of the year – even if ‘underlying shelter’ inflation was fully solved in early 2023!

If the Fed cuts interest rates, it is not likely that shelter inflation will alter its course. Wages and input prices in the US are behaving quite well.

Many cite the strength of the US economy as a reason for not cutting yet. The preliminary estimate of US GDP growth for the March quarter (Q1) was 1.6% against an expected 2.4%. The previous two quarters’ growth rates were 1.2% and 0.8% with Q1 growth at 0.4%. There is a clear trend emerging!

While the latest US GDP data could just be a blip, it should at least put the Fed on ‘amber alert’. The June quarter (Q2) is already well underway and monetary policy takes about 12-18 months to work its way through the economy.

US monetary policy did not become ‘restrictive’ until September 2022 – when the Fed funds rate climbed above the ‘neutral rate’ of, say, 3%. That first restrictive hike has only just worked its way fully through the economy and there are 2.25% points of additional hikes still in the pipeline and yet to be fully felt.

US employment data have seemingly held up but it has been well supported by quite a lot of financial stimulus spending by the Biden administration. Even so, there have only been 34,000 new jobs created in US manufacturing since October 2022.

Many reputable commentators are questioning the appropriateness (or accuracy) of US labour data. Each month a very big chunk of new jobs is in the government, health care and social administration sectors. And how many jobs do they need to create to be able to accommodate immigration flows? We are living in a new era for understanding labour movements: work from home (WFH); gig economy; GenZ reluctance to work in the traditional model; early retirement, etc.

We came across an interesting statistic about US interest rates this month. The average interest rate paid across all mortgages is 3.8% but the rate for new loans is 7.1%. Because of the very long fixed-term loans favoured in the US, typically 30 years, they have been cushioned from rate rises much more so than those borrowing in Australia (who typically borrow at a floating interest rate) – so long as they don’t move home!

Australia’s jobs data were all over the place from November through to February – we suspect due to statistical seasonal adjustment procedures that have a more marked impact over the summer student school leaver / holiday period.

Our latest change in total employment over a month was -6,600! However, there were 27,900 new full-time jobs offset by a big loss in part-time employment. The unemployment rate was 3.8%.

Our economic situation can be effectively monitored through changes in retail sales. In March, retail sales fell -0.4% for the month and was up 0.8% for the year. When we allow for inflation, sales (i.e. volumes) fell by -0.8% for the month and -2.8% for the year. If we also allow for population growth of about 2.5%, the volume of sales attributable to the average person has fallen by -4.5% for the year.

The cumulative fall in retail sales (volume) is -4.9% from September 2022 which increases to nearly -10% when we account for population growth. The average person in Australia is consuming about 10% less ‘things’ than they were in September 2022 and this trend in foregone consumption has continued to build month after month.

The average Australian resident is also carrying a mortgage burden far greater than that held in any recent period. Australian consumers are hurting yet some ‘experts’ are calling for rate increases. How much more pain do they want to put on the consumer and, for what?

Our latest CPI data was a bit of a miss at 1.0% for the quarter against an expected 0.8% but we also have a shelter (or household) category that is causing some stickiness. Lower rates would make it more viable for developers to build more houses and apartments to alleviate the rental crisis. Higher interest rates are more likely to exacerbate the rental situation.

Markets – both bonds and equities – have been buffeted by reactions to higher than anticipated inflation data and central bank commentary. However, there have been many strong company earnings’ reports in the US that underpin the S&P 500 valuations.

China produced some mixed economic data. Q1 growth came in at a brisk 5.3% compared to a more modest expectation of 4.6%. However, both monthly retail sales and industrial output missed expectations.

Asset Classes

Australian Equities

While most of the major markets are well up on the year-to-date (y-t-d), the ASX 200 ended April y-t-d up only +1.0%. For the month, the ASX 200 was down -2.9%.

Our analysis of LSEG broker forecasts for Australian listed companies’ earnings is strong, but some expected weak macro data along the way could make share markets jittery.

Most sectors on the ASX 200 – save for Materials (+0.6%) and Utilities (+4.9%) – were in negative territory in April.

The narrative of the RBA governor’s press conference on May 7th could be key in guiding near-term movements in the index.

International Equities

The S&P 500 was down -4.2% on the month but the London FTSE was up +2.4%. China’s Shanghai Composite (+2.1%) and Emerging Markets (+1.6%) also had gains in April.

The S&P 500 swirled over sessions during the month as news, which was difficult to interpret, was digested. Towards the end of April, some strong earnings data lifted investor spirits.

Bonds and Interest Rates

In our opinion, investors and traders are finding it difficult to interpret ‘new’ news. There is little doubt that inflation has been easing – at least in general – but the difficult (almost impossible) question is whether it is improving sufficiently quickly that central bankers will be moved to reduce interest rates.

Central bankers seemed to be worried that, if they start cutting interest rates too soon – and inflation returns (whether or not due to the policy change) then they will need to begin the inflation fight again by increasing interest rates, in an environment where they will have lost credibility.

For the reasons stated, we think the central bankers are being overly cautious. But when billionaire, and much revered banker, Jamie Dimon states that rates might have to go to 8% to quell inflation, it is hard for dissenters to be taken seriously.

Nevertheless, for the reasons given in the opening section, we are reasonably confident that the next move for interest rates should be down, not up. However, if interest rates are cut and then a new supply shock happens, like heightened military action or oil price shocks, inflation would come back – but not because of interest rate cuts. Interest rates have almost no impact on wars and oil prices.

There is little chance (as priced in by the fixed interest markets) that either the Fed on May 14st, or the RBA on May 7th will adjust interest rates.

The latest Fed ‘dot-plot’ chart (each dot is the interest rate forecast of a Fed board member) released in March showed three cuts in 2024. With the market now pricing in only one, or possibly two interest rate cuts, it will be interesting to see the Fed’s stance when the dot-plot is refreshed in June.

When analysing interest rate policies, there are two very separate questions. Firstly, what should the central bank do? Secondly, what will the central bank do?

The first question is much easier to answer. And the two answers could imply moves in opposite directions.

We think macro data – particularly in the USA and Australia – will present a much clearer picture over the next quarter or two. By then, all else being equal, that without central bank interest rate policy easing we could be closer to recession.

The ECB and the BoE are expected to cut their interest rates in June after some supportive (softening) inflation data.

Other Assets

Iron ore (+15.6%) and copper (+14.8%) prices jumped out of the gates in April. That backs a recovering China story.

Oil (+1.1%) and gold (3.7%) prices were up but by more modest amounts. The Australian dollar (-0.1%) was flat but the VIX (equity market ‘fear’ index) was well elevated earlier in April but started to retreat in the last week or so to 14.8 – or just above normal.

Regional Review

Australia

The federal budget will be handed down in mid-May. Some fiscal stimulus seems likely but, again, this is the government fighting the RBA and the latter seems uncertain as to what course to plot.

Because immigration has been so strong, the usual statistics do not show the extent of the economic pain that the average person is feeling.

Fortunately for investors, company earnings depend on total revenue and not on revenue per capita. Therefore, the ASX 200 can be resilient when the average consumer is not doing so well.

There were 27,900 new full-time jobs created in the latest month but that was offset by a loss of -34,500 part-time jobs.

The headline CPI inflation rate was expected to come in at 0.8% for the quarter (Q1) or 3.4% for the year. The outcome was 1.0% for Q1 and 3.6% for the year. The market reacted negatively to these data and seemingly encouraged some to call for a return to interest rate rises. The RBA is set to announce its next rate decision on May 7th. It is highly likely that the RBA will hold the interest rate at the current level but the fixed interest market is starting to price in a chance of a rate hike later in the year.

With the pipeline of past interest rate increases building up recessionary pressure, we might even soon see aggregate GDP (rather than per capita GDP) growth in negative territory.

Retail sales for March came in at -0.4% for the month and up +0.8% for the 12 months. When adjusted for inflation, sales volume was down -0.8% for the month and -2.8% for the year. In inflation-adjusted terms, consumers are purchasing -4.9% less than they were in September 2022. If we also account for population growth sales volume would be down by near -10%. There is no demand pressure left for the RBA to quell!

China

Not long after the last People’s Congress had stated a target for growth of 5%, GDP data came in for Q1 at 5.3%, which was well above the 4.6% expected.

However, retail sales came in at 3.1% against an expected 4.6%. Industrial output also missed expectations at 4.5% against an expected 6.0%.

At the end of April, the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for manufacturing beat expectations at 50.4 when 50.3 had been expected but the index was 50.8 in the previous month (a level below 50 indicates contraction and a level above indicates expansion). The non-manufacturing PMI was 51.2 against an expected 53.0. While these results are not strong, they are solid.

US

On the face of it, US jobs data were again good. There were 303,000 new jobs created against an expected 200,000. The wage growth importantly was only 0.3%. Producer price inflation was below expectations at 0.2% for the month against an expected 0.3%.

However, for the first time since the recovery from lockdowns, GDP growth disappointed; Q1 growth was well under expectations at 0.4%.

Retail sales surprised to the upside for the month. Growth of 0.4% had been expected but the outcome was 0.7%. However, the US statistical agency put a tolerance of ±0.5% on that estimate meaning that 0.7% isn’t statistically significantly different from the expectations. That didn’t stop the market from responding favourably to the sales data!

In our opinion the market started to react quite strongly to very small differences between expectations and outcomes – both up and down.

Europe

The UK just posted its second month of very small but positive GDP growth data. That could signal the end of the so-called ‘technical recession’. The Bank of England (BoE) held its interest rate steady at 4% in April but it is widely expected to start cutting interest rates from June.

EU and Germany inflation are starting to come close to target at 2.4% and 2.2%, respectively. The president of the European Central Bank (ECB) spent much of last year talking of the need to keep interest rates higher for longer. That stance seems to be softening.

The EU posted a gain in GDP in Q1 but the previous quarter was revised down to give two consecutive quarters of negative growth in the second half of 2023.

Rest of the World

Canada’s unemployment rate rose to 6.1% and its jobs’ creation was negative. Analysts are expecting the Bank of Canada to start cutting interest rates soon.

Japan inflation missed at 2.7% against an expected 2.8%. Core CPI was on expectations at 2.6%. Such is the skittishness of markets, the Nikkei opened down 3% following these data. We think the fall was more due to the general uncertainty about whether or not global monetary policy is working.

The US has passed legislation for US military aid to go to the Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel. Australia has also sent aid.

We acknowledge the significant contribution of Dr Ron Bewley and Woodhall Investment Research Pty Ltd in the preparation of this report.

Financial stability is a dream for many, and is often viewed as a cornerstone of a successful relationship. While love and communication are undoubtedly vital, money matters can be a source of tension for couples if not properly addressed. Whether you’re just starting your journey together or have been navigating life’s ups and downs for years, engaging in open and honest dialogues about money can lay the groundwork for a more secure future.

What are our individual financial goals?

Understanding each other’s financial aspirations can help you align your priorities and work towards a common vision for the future. This could include wanting to save for a house, preparing to start a family, or considering when and how you each want to retire. Retirement is a particularly important element as some imagine an entirely different life from their working life, so preparing for what that might look like for you both is essential.

How do we manage our finances together?

Deciding whether to merge finances completely, keep them separate, or adopt a hybrid approach is a decision that couples should make together. Discussing how you’ll handle joint expenses, such as rent or mortgage payments, utilities, and groceries, can help avoid misunderstandings down the road. It also assists both individuals in staying on course with their goals, as they’ll be aware of each other’s financial positions.

Do we have any debts?

Being transparent about any debts you have, such as loans or credit card debt, is crucial. Discuss how you’ll tackle these debts together and come up with a plan for paying them off. Understanding how you both feel about debt is also important. If one partner is strongly averse to debt, while the other heavily relies on leveraging and debt servicing, finding a middle ground or keeping assets separate may be the way forward.Top of Form

What is our approach to budgeting?

Taking the time to create a budget together is an effective way to manage household expenses and work towards achieving your financial goals. This could be tracked manually, using budgeting apps such as Frollo or YNAB, or through setting up automatic transfers. During this process, discussing how you will handle unexpected expenses (medical, house or car repairs etc.) is also important and may involve saving for an emergency fund.

In essence, navigating finances as a couple is about more than just money – it’s about building trust, understanding, and a shared vision for the future.

In the pursuit of financial well-being, one of the most critical steps is getting your debt under control. This journey is not just about eliminating debt but to also create sustainable habits for more success in the long-term.

Take a look below at Moneysmart’s simple yet effective steps to get out of debt and stay out of debt.

Know what you owe

The first step towards getting out of debt is understanding where you stand. Make a list of all your debts (credit cards, loan repayments, unpaid bills etc.), that includes how much each debt is, the minimum monthly repayment if applicable and when the payment is due. From here, you can add them up to see your total amount owed.

Get help if you need it

If your debt feels too overwhelming, you may be tempted by quick-fix solutions such as payday loans or increasing the limit on your credit card. Remember, your financial adviser is there to help. They can assist you with options you have available to you and create a plan to get you back on track.

Work out what you can afford to pay

Working out how much you can afford to pay towards your debts is the next step in getting things under control.

Start by making a budget where you include all the money you have coming in (salary, pension) and money going out (food, rent, mortgage). Add these up and compare the money in vs the money out.

Make savings or cuts

If you have more money going out than coming in, or your expenses are higher than you’d like, it’s time to decide what expenses you can cut. Pick things that are realistic and that you can stick to.

When you’ve made your spending cuts, subtract money going out from money coming in and the amount left over is how much you can pay towards your debt each month.

Prioritise your debt and bills

Work out the highest priority bills to pay first such as:

• Rent or mortgage payments
  Council rates and body corporate fees
• Electricity, gas, water and phone
• Car repayments

These high priority debts and bills should be paid first. If you’re having difficulty paying a big bill, contact your provider to see if they can offer an extension or pay in instalments.

Start small and snowball your payments

Now that you’ve prioritised your bills and your debt money is sorted, it’s time to get started on your repayments. The snowball method involves starting small and paying off your debts one by one following these steps:

• List your debts – from smallest to largest.
• Pay the minimum – pay the minimum amount due using your debt money.
• Pay off the smallest debt first – use the rest of your debt money to pay off the smallest debt. Pay as much as you can each month, until you clear it.
• Celebrate and repeat — when you’ve paid off that debt, reward yourself to inspire you to keep going. Then move onto paying off the next smallest debt, and so on.

Get a savings mindset

When you’ve got your debt under control, keep the momentum going by saving regularly to help you avoid problems in the future. A great start is to create an emergency fund or open a savings account

Taking control of your debt is a crucial step towards improving your financial well-being. The simple steps provided by Moneysmart, combined with the guidance and expertise of your financial adviser, can provide you with an effective roadmap to help you succeed.

Source: https://moneysmart.gov.au/managing-debt/get-debt-under-control

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

• US inflation ticks up a little but downward trend remains intact, rate cuts further deferred
• Australian inflation close to being back in the RBA target range
• Australian cost-of-living crisis not yet improving

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser.

The Big Picture

Only one month ago, the bond market ascribed a 50% chance to a US Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate cut in March and an 85% chance of two or more interest rate cuts by June. By the end of February, the chance of a rate cut in March was almost zero while only one cut is still deemed likely by June.

In essence, the market has come back closer to the Fed’s way of thinking as espoused at its December meeting. It now appears that three interest rate cuts in 2024 are more likely, rather than the six or even seven the market had toyed with as late as January this year.

The changes in the market’s expectations are due to updated inflation data and recent Fed commentary. Inflation data are ‘noisy’ (prone to short-term volatility) and are also impacted by such things as changes in the oil price. US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation data in January and early February were not quite as good (low) as expected but they were not bad or even poor. The Fed’s comments have leant towards their trying to avoid cutting interest rates too soon for fear of a resurgence of inflation that might then force the Fed to revert to a tightening bias from its current neutral or ‘on hold’ stance.

The Fed is important to Australia, not only in terms of the US being a major economic power, but also due to its apparent influence on our central bank, the RBA, which seems likely to wait for the Fed to move before it does. The RBA governor and the committee are new this year and they seem to be still feeling their way a bit.

We see the case for cutting sooner rather than later as being different in the two countries.

The US economic data to date have been much stronger than many had anticipated. Perhaps this is due to savings and government spending (fiscal) policies as having fought against the central bank ‘monetary’ policy in the tightening cycle. However, there are some cracks appearing in the data. US retail sales in value terms only rose by +0.6% over the last 12 months so, with inflation running at +3.1%, inflation-adjusted retail sales (i.e. volume) are going backwards at ‑2.5% p.a.

US jobs data largely look strong but, as a Bloomberg reporter noted in February, labour market data should be viewed with a ‘dollop’ of salt (rather than the proverbial pinch). Collecting meaningful data is difficult at the best of times. The pandemic has a lot to answer for; the ‘gig’ economy adds new challenges; and the response-rates to data collecting agencies around the world have been tested in recent times.

Here in Australia, massive immigration flows have masked the true state of the economy. When GDP growth is measured in per capita terms, growth in four of the last six quarters has been negative and, even without correcting for population growth, inflation-adjusted retail sales have also been negative in four of the last six quarters. We think that is more than enough evidence to call the Australian economy as, in recession.

On top of the observed aggregate data, we know that mortgage rates have increased rapidly in recent times and any relief from holding fixed-rate mortgages taken during the pandemic has largely dissipated as the ‘mortgage cliff’ rolled over. Contrast the US system that largely depends on mortgagees holding very long-term fixed rates – up to 30 years i.e. the negative cashflow effect of Australian fixed rate borrowers moving from fixed-mortgage rates of circa 2.0% to circa 6.0% as their low fixed-rate terms ended and they began paying the no much higher variable or new fixed rates, did not occur in the US as their mortgages are largely 30-year fixed rate loans.

While the US CPI inflation data released in mid-February was an improvement over the previous month, the data missed market forecasts. The Fed prefers the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) measure because it does not depend on a fixed basket of goods. Rather, the weights in the PCE measure adjust to consumer preferences over time.

The latest PCE inflation read at the end of February was +0.3% for the month of January and +2.4% over the last 12 months. The core variant, that strips out volatile energy and food components, was +0.4% for the month and +2.8% for the year.

The latest wage data in the US, adjusted for inflation ran at +1.4% over the year. While this number might be a little above historical comfort levels, it is necessary for workers to play catch-up in recovering the substantial losses made in the early part of the inflation cycle. We do not see any material evidence for a wage price spiral. Measured inflation expectations in the US have been quite stable at a little above +2%.

Inflation-adjusted wages in Australia have fallen substantially since the onset of the pandemic. However, that fall has since been arrested and there is some evidence of catch-up starting to emerge. If and when inflation falls sustainably back to the 2% to 3% RBA target-band, that does not mean prices return to pre-pandemic levels. Only deflation (negative values of inflation) can restore prices to previous levels or wage increases above inflation for a sustained time are needed to restore cost of living standards.

The latest monthly Australian CPI data for January were released at the end of February. The coverage of this index is around 70% of the quarterly index and that 70% is skewed towards goods rather than services.

The headline rate was +3.4% for the year and +4.1% for the core variant that strips out certain volatile goods like food, energy and vacation travel. We also produce regular in-house measures that better keep track of recent changes in trends. Our latest headline rate was +3.0% and the core was +2.3%. Both were within the RBA target range. We update these estimates every month. Neither variant has been above the target range for the last three, monthly updates.

Australia labour force data posted a second poor monthly reading in a row. Only 500 net new jobs were created following a loss of 65,100 in the prior month. The unemployment rate rose to 4.1% from 3.9%.

Around the world, many countries are suffering relatively poor economic times. Britain and Japan both slipped into recession using the popular ‘two negative quarters of economic growth’ definition. Interestingly, both of their major stock market indexes posted strong gains following these data releases. This type of behaviour underpins our view that our market does not necessarily have to perform poorly if further economic weakness becomes apparent. Markets are based on expectations while most economic data is a view in the rear-vision mirror.

After about a year of Ukraine holding its own against Russia, a lack of decision-making in the US Congress has led to a disruption in military supplies. Probably as a result, a major Ukrainian city fell to Russian forces during February. There has not been much impact of this conflict on economies in the rest of the word. But, without renewed support from the US in particular, that could change.

The Israel-Palestine conflict shows little sign of abating. The human suffering has reportedly been immense. There seems little chance of a resolution any time soon. The Israel GDP fell 20% in the December quarter compared to an expected fall of ‘only’ 10%.

Bond markets have stabilised and Wall Street has powered on following healthy report cards from the AI-chip designer NVIDIA and some others from the so-called ‘Magnificent Seven’ mega tech stocks.

The S&P 500 reached record highs in February as did the ASX 200. Even the Nikkei posted an all-time high that had stood since 1989!

The investing outlook will largely depend on how central banks report conditions and prospects, as much the actual data themselves. But conditions can change rapidly. If they do, we expect heightened equity-market volatility but longer-run prospects seem average to above average for investors in the nearer term.

Asset Classes

Australian Equities

The ASX 200 made a new all-time high in February but finished the month almost flat. The performances of the sectors were polarised. Energy, Materials and Telcos all fell more than -5% over the month. Consumer Discretionary gained more than +5% and IT gained nearly +20%!

Companies reporting earnings in February produced a mixed bag of results and, as a result, the broker forecasts collected by LSEG that we analyse show a slight weaking in earnings expectations for the next 12 months. However, that expectation is still just above the historical average.

International Equities

The London FTSE was flat in February but all of the other major indexes we follow gained around +4% or more. The S&P 500 was up +5.2%.

A lot of the impetus in Wall Street appears to have come from the big beat of the AI-chip designer, NVIDIA, earnings and prospects. This behaviour gives us some faith in the continuance of the Magnificent Seven rally that started a year ago – although one or two of the ‘seven’ seem to have fallen away from the peloton somewhat.

Our analysis of the LSEG broker forecasts reveal that forward expectations have held up through the US reporting season.

Bonds and Interest Rates

After 1 February Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) meeting, in which rates were kept in hold at 5.25% to 5.5%, Fed Chair, Jerome Powell stated that they were ‘confident inflation is coming down’ but that ‘they are not confident enough to start cutting’ yet.

The CME Fedwatch tool is pricing in about a 2% chance of a 0.25% interest rate cut at the March meeting. There is a modest chance of a rate cut priced in by the May meeting but there is over a 60% chance of a cut at the June meeting of the FOMC. The median expected number of interest rate cuts by the end of the year is three, but four rate cuts have a broadly similar probability.

Official US inflation data have been steadily improving but the gains are sluggish arguably because of the manner in which the shelter component of the price index is calculated. Currently shelter inflation stands at +6% and its weight in the CPI is around one third. Most commentators believe that the true measure for shelter is more like +3%. Therefore, we expect a big correction of 1% point or more in the CPI when the measure catches up with reality.

The RBA kept rates ‘on hold’. In the first media conference in the new RBA board setting, the governor may have embarrassed the board by trying to walk away from the three cuts in 2024 contained in the notes. She said that these three cuts were not forecasts or expectations but ‘assumptions’ as though this was a new category in policy making. It would be illogical to use anything but expectations for assumptions unless the Board wanted to convey outcomes under clearly differentiated assumptions such as base, best case and worst case.

Australian inflation data measured over the trailing 12-months is still above the RBA target range of 2.0% to 3.0% but it is well within that range when a shorter time period is used. We think there is little to no evidence of wage inflation becoming a problem if rates are cut and the data measuring demand point to a struggling economy for the average Australian. However, very strong immigration flows mask the extent of this economic weakness in the aggregate data.

We believe that the RBA will try to wait for the Fed to cut interest rates first before it takes its own corrective action. Therefore, we see the overhang of tight monetary policy causing even further hardship. Market expectations data support no cuts in the near term.

If we are correct in our analysis of the true state of the Australian economy and its likely course in the short-run, the RBA might be forced to do bigger cuts of say 50 bps when it does start easing policy.

Japan’s inflation rate has pulled back sufficiently for some to suggest that it may at last be able to start returning its benchmark rate to above 0% for the first time since 2016!

Other Assets

The price of oil recovered even more ground in February resulting in Brent ending the month at $US84 per barrel (Brent Crude price). This level is far from the $US95 that caused such problems with our inflation at the end of the September quarter. That oil price spike was caused by the onset of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

The price of iron ore again fell around 10% but, at $US117 per tonne, it is still well above the $US100 level that it came close to in the second half of 2023.

The prices of copper and gold were largely flat over February.

The Australian dollar – against the US dollar – depreciated by ‑0.8%.

Regional Review

Australia

Australian retail sales (in volume terms) rose +0.3% in the December quarter and fell ‑1.0% over 2023. Volume sales fell in four of the last six quarters. When population growth is taken into account, sales volumes fell by around ‑3.5% in 2023. This measure emphasises the extent of the very real cost-of-living crisis.

With the latest household savings ratio at 1.1% (compared to around 4% to 6% in normal times), growth for the December quarter – to be released in the first week of March – will slow appreciably from the +0.2% for the September quarter (+2.1% for the year) – or households will have been forced into no saving – or even dis-saving. A rate cut by the RBA, if passed on to mortgage holders would alleviate some of this burden in future quarters.

The labour force data were again very weak. Only 500 jobs were created in January but there was a switch of around 10,000 jobs from part-time to full-time. We previously reported that data for December were particularly grim but we attributed some of that apparent weakness to inappropriate statistical procedures designed to remove predictable seasonal patterns.

The unemployment rate is less susceptible to these adjustments as it is the ratio of two quantities, so adjusted. The latest unemployment rate is 4.1%, up from 3.9% the month before and 3.5% in June 2023. That makes the average unemployment rate equal to 4.0% for the last three months which is 0.5% above the low over the previous 12 months. A gap of that size is the basis of the Sahm-rule (named after the Fed member who devised the indicator) to predict a forthcoming recession.

The wage price index came in at +4.2% growth for 2023 which is above the +3.1% CPI inflation index over the same period. This 1.1% premium does not show wage demand is problematic. On average, wage growth should exceed price growth as workers are rewarded for productivity gains.

The current inflation-adjusted wage (or real wage) is 7% below its mid-2020 level. Workers are only able to buy 7% less in volume terms and there is the cumulative impact of this real wage-cut over time.

China

China’s economic data continue to be weak but not so much as to jeopardise our exports of iron ore and other commodities from Australia. The latest official Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for manufacturing was a slight beat at 49.1 but below the 50-level that separates contraction from expansion in expectations.

China did move in February to cut a key interest rate and it seems to be pursuing an expansionary policy, albeit more slowly and carefully than in recent times.

China must deal with the problems of debt levels in its property sector while only stimulating the non-property sectors.

US

US CPI headline inflation came in at +0.3% for January against an expected +0.2% and +3.1% for the year against an expected +2.9%. Core inflation was +0.4% for the month against an expected 0.3% and 3.9% for the year against an expected 3.7%. The actual data were quite good compared to recent history but economists had reduced their forecasts quite sharply. Thus, the outcomes were considered poor (higher inflation being bad) and the chance of an interest rate cut was deferred further.

Our rolling quarterly estimates (annualised) were +2.8% p.a. and +4.0% p.a. for the headline and core CPI variants, respectively. Both were higher than in the prior month.

However, the real issue is how the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) calculates a key component – shelter. Bloomberg reported that the BLS sent out an email to some clients about the problems with this component and then retracted it causing ‘confusion’. It has been suggested that this data problem might take five months to work through the system.

The Fed’s preferred PCE inflation data painted an even better picture. The monthly headline rate was +0.3% while for the year it was +2.4%. It’s getting very close to the target 2%! The core monthly read was +0.4% and for the year it was +2.8%. Given the problems we are experiencing with the shelter component of the CPI data, we are relying more heavily on the PCE measure at this time in our analysis.

US jobs grew by an unexpected and very large 353,000 in January. The expected range was 120,000 to 300,000 showing the high degree of uncertainty in the labour market data. Past data were also revised sharply. The unemployment rate remains at a healthy level of 3.7%.

Retail sales came in at ‑0.8% for January (expected ‑0.3%) following a revised +0.4% for December. The annual figure was +0.6% which was well below inflation at +3.1%. In real terms, the consumer is not as strong as some would have us believe.

The December quarter GDP estimate was revised down slightly from +3.3% to +3.2%.

Europe

Britain went into a ‘technical recession’ with its latest growth data for the December quarter. However, its retail sales in value terms grew by 3.4% in January after a ‘grim’ December. These data are very much in line with the recent US sales values that showed January was up 1.1% following a December decline of ‑2.1%. In short, we firmly believe that traditional seasonal patterns are being disrupted by ‘Black Friday’ internet sales. The Bank of England had kept its interest rate on hold at 5.25%.

Rest of the World

Israel’s December quarter GDP growth plunged by -20% compared to an expected fall of ‑10%. With so many Israelis mobilised to enter the conflict in Gaza, it might take some time for the situation to get back to normal in both a human and an economic sense.

Russia has taken advantage of a disruption in US aid to take over a large Ukrainian city in their ongoing conflict.

Japan entered a ‘technical recession’ but there seem to be two favourable outcomes. Inflation has dropped leading to a possible return to normal monetary policy settings (rather than the ‑0.1% base rate that has been in place since 2016). Secondly, after 35 years, the Nikkei share price index reached a new all-time high.

We acknowledge the significant contribution of Dr Ron Bewley and Woodhall Investment Research Pty Ltd in the preparation of this report

Shaping solid financial habits in youngsters isn’t just about numbers. It’s a crucial part of their education that equips them with skills that will serve them well into adulthood. We’ve listed some simple ways that you can involve kids in the learning process and build a foundation for financial responsibility.

Lead by Example

As we know, children pick up a lot of habits by observing the behaviour of the adults around them (some we really wish they wouldn’t!). You can demonstrate responsible spending habits by avoiding impulse purchases, paying bills on time and saving. Don’t hesitate to share stories of your own experiences with money, both successes and challenges, as this provides transparency and real-world context.

Play Money Games

Engaging in educational games centered around money can making the learning process fun for children. Board games like Monopoly or The Game of Life that simulate financial scenarios can teach them valuable lessons about budgeting, investing, and making strategic financial decisions.

Encourage Saving

Piggy banks are a great way for children to learn the importance of saving, and although money is becoming increasingly virtual, having physical coins and notes can help them see their money as it grows. Assisting them to set saving goals for a new toy or experience they’d like also teaches patience and discipline to achieve what they set their minds to.

Involve them in Budgeting

As children get older, involving them in family budget discussions can provide them with insights into financial responsibility. Sharing age-appropriate information about income, expenses, and the importance of budgeting, can allow them to contribute ideas on cost-cutting measures or ways to allocate funds for an upcoming family holiday or house project. This involvement not only educates them about financial planning but also instils a sense of ownership and responsibility.

Open a Kids Bank Account

Many banks offer special savings accounts designed for children. Opening an account in their name, with their involvement, can be an exciting step toward financial independence. Teach them how to monitor their account balance, understand statements, and set savings goals. Some banks even offer rewards or incentives for regular savings deposits, reinforcing positive financial habits.

Teach the power of giving back

Encouraging children to allocate a portion of their money to charity helps foster empathy, generosity and a sense of social responsibility. Discuss the impact their contributions can make towards helping those in need or supporting a cause they’re passionate about.

Teaching kids about money early can help them to navigate the complex financial landscape with confidence. By starting simple, incorporating practical experiences and leading by example, parents can assist in shaping their children’s financial values and behaviours.

In this month’s update, we provide a snapshot of economic occurrences both nationally and from around the globe.

Key points:

• The US Federal Reserve has pivoted from a tightening interest rate policy to an easing one
• Markets are looking at growth and inflation data points to estimate first interest rate cuts
• Economic indicators are softening but inflation is still at risk from the Middle East conflict

We hope you find this month’s Economic Update as informative as always. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss any aspect of this report, please contact your Financial Adviser.

The Big Picture

The US Federal Reserve (Fed) chairman, Jerome Powell, started last December by pronouncing it was ‘premature to talk about rate cuts’. By the end of December, the Fed ‘pivot’ was locked in (and the Fed had changed from a tightening interest rate policy bias to an easing one). Even the Fed then expected three cuts in 2024 but the market wanted more, forecasting up to 6!

During January 2024 opinions settled into less diverse scenarios. Cuts are still very much on the table but the 31 January meeting was considered ‘dead’, i.e. no change to interest rates throughout the month. However, the market had ascribed about a 50% chance of a cut in March and an 85% chance of at least two cuts by June.

Powell did not disappoint by keeping rates on hold but he did upset the market by saying that ‘he didn’t see a cut in March’. He said he was confident that inflation has been on track over the last six months but that he was not sufficiently confident to start cutting interest rates by March.

After these comments by Powell, the market priced in a 35% change of an interest rate cut in March. But the market is still pricing in two or more cuts by June at around a 90% chance. The bond market is still pricing in six cuts this year but the S&P 500 lost steam after Powell’s post Fed meeting press conference losing -1.6% on the day.

Interestingly, a survey conducted by media company CNBC just prior to the January Fed meeting reported that only 9% of respondents expected a cut by March and 70% said the first cut would be in June! Economists and traders often disagree. Usually only the latter has real skin in the game.

Depending on how one looks at the data – in the US and Australia – one can see a serious slow down or, at the other extreme, a gentle ‘soft landing’. The deciding factor, as we see it, relates to how one interprets the factors that caused the recent slow-down in inflation across the major economies. Those who think it was the deft response of central banks harnessing demand-side inflation with rate cuts, fear letting monetary policy ease – in case inflation then consequently re-emerges. This is Powell’s stated position.

Those who think the source of the inflation, starting in 2020 from the Covid pandemic, largely resulted from the supply side (i.e. global production slowed because of lockdowns, likewise transportation of goods largely stopped and the price of available goods rose materially due to lack of local supply during, and after the Covid restrictions eased, this being further exacerbated by the Ukraine war) are of the view that interest rates could be cut without inflation being reignited because the supply side issues have ceased. This group includes some eminent people – bankers and academics and a Nobel Laureate.

While we subscribe to this view more recently, we agree that rates could be cut without material consequence at this juncture. Failure to cut interest rates from the current restrictive levels could see them rapidly start to bite and cause economies to slow more than anticipated or intended by Central Banks. However, we do not as yet advocate the respective interest rates should move to below the neutral rate of about 2.5% to 3% in this easing cycle and certainly, they should not reduce back to emergency levels.

It has only been a little over a year since monetary policy in Australia and the US has been tightened (above the neutral rate). With the long and variable lags (say, 12 to 18 months) of effect of monetary policy settings, we are only just starting to witness some slowing effects from the interest rate hikes. Fed chair Powell acknowledged this in his January press release.

Of course, the pandemic added its own idiosyncrasies into the mix. People were forced to save because of lack of opportunities to spend under lock downs and governments added stimulus payments to ease the crisis. Those excess savings sheltered economies from monetary policy tightening – for a while. This time was indeed different but those excess savings have now largely been depleted. We are back to normal conditions for assessing monetary policy effects.

The latest Australian labour force data (for December) revealed an apparent massive crack in the economy. Total employment went down by 65,100 but the full-time position loss was even worse. 106.600 full-time jobs were lost in a month while the population grew by 48,200.

The monthly data does jump around somewhat but we have only had six months of decreases in the last 24 and the next worst result was less than half of the December outcome.

The unemployment rate held up at 3.9% but only because of the discouraged-worker effect. People who left jobs and didn’t bother joining the unemployment queues!

Before we jump to a disturbing conclusion, it is important to note that data have regular seasonal patterns (e.g. temperature related demand). The ABS uses averaging techniques to remove the regular seasonal component so that month-to-month or quarter-to-quarter changes better reflect new directions rather than predictable seasonal patterns.

For many data series, the ABS also smooths the seasonal data to produce ‘trend data’ so that longer-run trends become more apparent. While these are useful for a cursory glance, we tend not to rely on trend data in research houses and create our own opinions of underlying movement.

So, in relation to employment the actual number of jobs (original data) went up by 18,400 and not down sharply in December by the seasonally-adjusted 65,100. It was the statistical process designed to smooth out the data that did the damage. What if the seasonal patterns have changed since last year? We have had a year of record immigration and December is a month when lots of students start to enter the workforce. The large loss could be due to a statistical anomaly.

Furthermore, the monthly official data are prone to bounce around as the figure for the population are extrapolated from a very small sample. In addition to the sampling issue, it has been noted in various countries that telephone surveys are becoming less reliable because younger folk are less likely to ‘pick up’ the phone call from a number not familiar to them.

We are not unnecessarily concerned over these employment data but we are on alert to look for more clues when the January data are released in mid-February.

The US jobs data seemed somewhat stronger. 216,000 jobs were created compared to the expected 170,000. The expected range of forecasts was quite wide: 100,000 to 250,000. Importantly, digging deeper, reflected new jobs yet again largely being created in less productive sectors. The three-month average of new jobs was 165,000 compared to 284,000 in the same period a year earlier. And these data have a strong tendency to be revised downwards in subsequent months.

The US labour market is slowing and possibly a little more quickly than the headline data appear to convey.

It seems to be generally agreed that inflation in the US and Australia is returning to target levels more quickly than many had anticipated. Our own calculations based on more timely measures indeed suggest inflation is all but back to target.

However, the big issue on the sidelines might be events starting to cause a second-round oil-price inflation problem like that at the onset of the Ukraine conflict.

We are not experts in analysing military conflicts and their evolution but a simple reading of respectable news sources leads us to note that the Israel-Palestine conflict has involved more countries and groups over the last couple of months.

Some oil tankers and container ships are reportedly being diverted away from the Red Sea route to Europe and the US (and the reverse) because of drone and other attacks. The route via the Cape of Good Hope adds much time and, hence, cost to traded goods.

Brent oil prices declined to about US$75 per barrel before the Middle East conflict after having been US$95 slightly earlier in 2023. Brent oil bounced back to US$85 and has settled to just below that level – so some new inflation pressures must be building.

We have no insight into how, or indeed if, the conflict will be resolved but it is apparent that some of the hard-fought gains in inflation control will be eroded. However, it is equally obvious that keeping interest rates higher for longer will do nothing to reduce oil-price inflation pressure.

Markets have largely performed well in January. The S&P 500 and the ASX 200 reached all-time highs during the month. Bond yields have retraced a little from the late 2023 fall but not alarmingly so.

With the December quarter reporting season in the US and second half reporting season in Australia getting underway, we have a great opportunity to understand better what 2024 has in store for us. Our analysis of LSEG (formerly Thomson Reuters) company earnings expectations suggests that the outlook for 2024 has, if anything, improved over January as brokers update their forecasts.

The early reporting results on Wall Street have produced a bit of a mixed bag of success and failure in the big tech space. United Parcel Service (UPS) is laying off lots of workers because it doesn’t see internet-created demand sustaining the old system. Big Tech might not perform anywhere are strongly as it did in 2023 but we are expecting above average gains in the broad index.

But with recent all-time highs on the US S&P 500 and the local ASX 200, and stable bond markets, 2024 does not look bad! We think the Fed will do what we expected and cut interest rates as it does not want to alarm markets by changing their monetary policy direction and settings too much and too quickly despite it now being characterised as a ‘pivot’.

Asset Classes

Australian Equities

The ASX 200 was modestly up in January (+1.2%), largely because the index started the month at an elevated level following the December rally, but that was not so for the individual sectors. Energy and Financials each grew about +5.0% but Materials (‑4.8%) fell by a largely offsetting amount. The broader index closed January at an all-time high.

January and July often witness bigger changes in broker expectations about earnings as the new half-yearly reporting season sets to get underway (for February and August). We did not see much change this January but, if anything, expectations point to a slightly stronger year than we saw for 2024 at the end of 2023.

However, the consensus end of year (eoy) 2024 forecast we have gleaned from published reports (made at January 1^st) from reputable houses was, for the ASX 200, 7,600 points or just below the closing value on 31 January (7,681). While we are not expecting a bumper 2024, our analysis suggests that this consensus forecast could be a little too pessimistic. Our expected capital gains in the ASX 200 look reasonable but when dividends and franking credits are factored in, this asset is worthy of serious consideration for 2024.

International Equities

Japan’s share market index, the Nikkei, had a particularly strong month (+8.4%) but the US S&P 500 (+1.6%) was only moderately strong – largely because of the big sell-off on the last day of January following the Fed’s press conference. China (‑6.3%) and Emerging Markets (‑3.1%) went backwards.

A lot might depend on whether the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-led rally of 2023 continues or, indeed, retraces. Without the so-called Magnificent Seven (big technology stocks), the S&P 500 index would not have been impressive at all in 2023.

However, the consensus eoy 2024 forecast we have gleaned for the S&P 500 from published reports (made at 1 January) was 5,000 points or just above the closing value on 31 January (4,846). While we are not expecting a bumper 2024, our analysis of broker forecasts suggests that this consensus is somewhat pessimistic.

Bonds and Interest Rates

At the end of January the Fed funds interest rate was on hold at a range 5.25% to 5.5%. The CME Fedwatch tool is pricing in about a 35% chance of a 0.25% interest rate cut at the Fed’s March meeting. The same source is predicting that there is only about a 10% chance of the Fed funds interest rate being unchanged by June. The prospect of two or three 0.25% interest rate cuts by June being about the same and collectively by far the most likely outcome.

The European Central Banks (ECB) and the Bank of England (BoE) also kept interest rates on hold in January in spite of their slightly improving inflation outlooks.

The RBA kept our interest rates ‘on hold’ on their meeting on the first Tuesday in February. In our opinion, there is evidence that the Australia economy is in need of some rate relief, as the surging immigration levels are masking the cost-of-living pressures on the average household.

Since company earnings from selling to Australians are determined by aggregate demand – and not by per capita (household) demand – the ASX 200 can grow while a per capita recession takes place.

The 10-year Treasury yield in the US fell from just on 5% in October to a recent low of 3.8%, since then it drifted up a fraction to 4.1%. After the latest Fed meeting this yield retraced to just under 4.0%. The Australian 10-year yield ended January at 4.01%.

We expect some more visibility on Australian monetary policy from the RBA from here onwards, as the new committee appears to be charged with the task of improving communications.

Other Assets

The price of oil bounced back sharply from December’s lows. Both West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent Crude oil were up by about +8% largely on the impact of the Middle East conflict and more recently issues with shipping in the Red Sea.

The prices copper and gold were largely flat over January. The price of iron ore fell by ‑6.3%.

The Australian dollar – against the US dollar – depreciated by ‑3.9% which will not help our inflation cause through import prices increases.

Regional Review

Australia

Australian November retail sales (in value terms) published at the start of January surprised at +2.0% for the month – but they grew only +2.2% for the year. This growth becomes negative when inflation is taken into account. In addition, population growth running at about +2.5% p.a. suggests the average citizen was consuming a lot less in inflation and population-adjusted terms.

The monthly retail value data for December were published at the end of January. The seasonally adjusted monthly growth for December was ‑2.3% (not annualised) wiping out the November gain. But, just as with the change in employment data, retail sales as collected by the ABS were up +14.3% on the month in ‘original terms’. It was the seasonal adjustment process that converted +14.3% into ‑2.3%.

Non-specialists might ask if the ABS is competent at performing the task at hand. While we think the ABS is world class, their task is very difficult when seasonal patterns are changing. In due course, we believe that the data will be revised. They will still likely not be good but not as bad as we see at first sight.

There were also two reads on the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation gauge published in January owing to the delay in reporting November data because of our holiday season.

Both the headline and the core monthly variants for November were +0.3%. The 12-month gains were +4.3% for the headline and +4.8% for the core variant that excludes volatile energy, food and holiday travel. Our rolling quarterly estimates which we produce each month was +3.0% p.a. for both the headline and core variants. That puts these inflation estimates at the top of the RBA target range.

At the end of January, quarterly CPI data were released. The monthly data, in order to be more timely, has only about 70% coverage of the quarterly basket of goods and services.

The official read for the Quarterly index series was +0.6% for the quarter and +4.1% for the year (expected +4.3%). Note that +0.6% for the quarter, if annualised, becomes +2.4% p.a. and is within the RBA target range.

The monthly series official reads over the year for December were +3.4% from +4.3% for the headline and +4.0% from +4.6% for the core. Our in-house rolling quarterly estimates (annualised) were +1.3% p.a. for the headline and +2.4% p.a. for the core. The RBA has over-achieved! +1.3% is below the target range.

The core measures over the last five months have been +5.5%, +5.1%, +4.1%, +2.7% and +2.4%. We think that is a stable downward trend and indicative of the RBA may have gone too far, and at a minimum, far enough, given the lags in the system for interest rate hikes to work through. With the RBA target range being 2-3% the RBA needs to act in a timely manner with rate cuts to prevent overshooting on core inflation.

The jobs data for December showed that the participation rate had fallen from 67.3% to 66.8% reflecting a strong discouraged worker effect. In essence, 41,400 full-time jobs were converted to part-time while, in addition, 65,100 full-time jobs were lost from the workforce. The unemployment rate remained at 3.9%.

China

China’s GDP growth came in at +5.2% against an expected +5.3% but the market seemed to interpret this result as being very weak. Retail sales also missed at +7.4% compared to +8.0% expected but industrial output at +6.8% beat the +6.6% forecast.

The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) a measure of industrial demand was 49.0 for December which was down from the 49.4 read in November. At the end of January the PMI for January rose slightly to 49.2.

The big problem in China still relates to the debt burden mainly of property developers. The Hong Kong government recently ruled that Evergrande the formally very large mainland property developer should be placed into liquidation. The government is reportedly trying to ring-fence a few of the big developers to stop a spread of the problem. At the end of the January, China noted that it had merged ‘hundreds of rural banks’ to reduce risks of failure.

US

US CPI inflation came in at +0.3% for both the headline and the core variants of the measure.

Over the year, headline inflation has come down to +3.4% and the core to +3.9%. While these numbers are far from the Fed target of 2% the market seemed to breathe a sigh of relief that substantial progress had been made.

Our rolling quarterly estimates (annualised) were +1.8% p.a. and +3.3% p.a. for the headline and core variants, respectively. The headline rate was below the Fed target of 2%! There should be two more releases of the US CPI before the next Fed meeting to make the next interest rate call.

The Fed’s preferred Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) inflation data painted an even better picture. The monthly core and headline rates were each +0.2% while for the year they were +2.9% and +2.6% respectively.

The Fed fears a resurgence in inflation if it starts to cut too soon. Supply-side shocks such as higher oil prices and disrupted supply chains due to restricted access to the Suez Canal due to the conflict in the Middle East, are almost unpredictable and inflation expectations data do not support a demand-side surge in inflation.

The US consumer appeared to be somewhat resilient in January. Retail sales (for December) grew by +0.6% – well ahead of inflation. The December quarter GDP growth was +3.3% when only +2.0% had been expected. The household savings ratio fell to +4.0% from +4.2% indicating some pressure on budgets.

Over 2023, economic growth was +2.5% following +1.9% for the previous year. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey showed that 28% of Americans thought the economy is in excellent or good shape. The corresponding figure for April 2022 was only 19% but, in January 2020, just prior to the onset of the pandemic, the Michigan figure was 57%.

While some reported that the current 28% figure showed some resilience, we think it would at least be equally plausible to state that the consumer is not as pessimistic as they were but nowhere near as optimistic as they were before the interest rate-hiking cycle began.

Existing home sales were the lowest since 1995 but, that is to be expected when mortgage rates are historically high and expected to fall in the coming months.

Europe

German inflation rose to +3.8% while, for the eurozone, it was +2.9%. The UK recorded +4.6% inflation and its retail sales fell -3.2% when a fall of only -0.5% had been expected.

The Europe economy is clearly in a worse position than the US and it has been paying the price for once becoming so dependent on energy/fuel from Russia.

Rest of the World

The conflict in the Middle East has certainly escalated and the deaths of US soldiers has seen a retaliatory military action against specific targets in the region, in particular to stem the terrorist attacks from inside Yemen on ships in and around the Red Sea and other military targets. To date, the economic consequences of the conflict seem less than that from the Ukraine war as there is a simple, but costlier, option to avoid the Red Sea shipping lanes by diverting round the Cape of Good Hope in southern Africa to access Europe and the US particularly with crude oil sourced from the Middle East.

Have you made any new year’s resolutions for 2024? Resolutions offer a fresh start to the year and initially spark excitement that holds strong for a month or two. However, they can easily slip away when life throws its curveballs.

It will come as no surprise that the most common resolutions amongst Australians are fitness and diet related*, but financial goals closely follow with many eager to improve their saving and spending habits.

Creating and sticking to the goals we set is challenging, but following the SMART method may just be what you need to see them through. SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound, providing a structured framework to turn vague intentions into actionable plans. So, how does it work?

1. Specific: Define Clear Objectives

To get started, identify precisely what you want to achieve. Instead of a broad goal like “save more money”, make it specific. For example, “save $5,000 in the holiday fund” or “pay off $3,000 of credit card debt”.

2. Measurable: Quantify Your Progress

Establish criteria to measure your progress. If your goal is to save money for a holiday, determine how much and by when. Tracking your progress holds you accountable while providing a sense of accomplishment as your reach milestones along the way.

3. Achievable: Set Realistic Targets

Setting the goal of becoming a millionaire by the end of the year isn’t achievable for most of us, so while it’s great to aim high, be realistic about what you can achieve and by when. Consider your income, expenses and any other factors that may impact your targets.

4. Relevant: Align Goals with Your Values

Aligning your financial goals with your values creates a sense of purpose and makes it easier to stay committed. If homeownership is a long-term aspiration, saving for a deposit might be more relevant than short-term investments.

5. Time-bound: Establish a Deadline

Attaching a timeframe to your goals creates a sense of urgency, adds structure to your plan and prevents procrastination. For example, instead of saying “save for a holiday”, say “save $3,000 for a summer holiday by September 30^th”.

When setting your SMART goals for the year ahead, remember that flexibility and adaptability are key. Our lives can change constantly, so your financial goals should evolve too. Good luck!